The Power of Storytelling in Medical Education (Part 1)

During last week’s Alliance Industry Summit, the primary theme of the keynote address was the power of storytelling as an educational tool. While there was far too much table interaction for my liking that really made me squirm (if you know Derek and I, you know how much we looove being forced to participate with strangers on any creative task), I did appreciate the general thrust of the session. Storytelling, you see, is one of the thing I am most passionate about both professionally and personally. If you are a faithful reader of this blog — and if you aren’t, shame on you — you hopefully have learned a lot about CMEpalooza and our personalities through our stories (or perhaps you have a poster of the CMEslinger on your wall and can’t wait for his return in 2026 for another adventure).

Think about a memorable conversation you recently had with a friend, family member, or colleague. Most of our “How were your day?” conversations may end with “Fine” or “Mid” (especially if you live with a teenager), but any time that question elicits anything memorable, it usually involves a “let me tell you a story about this interesting/funny/embarrassing thing that happened to me today.” We can’t often relate to being lectured about topics to which we have little or no personal connection, but it’s easy to relate to a well-told story from crazy Aunt Martha.

In the sessions we develop for CMEpalooza, the accredited education that I oversee as part of my “real” job, and even the historic tours I lead around Philadelphia every summer, storytelling plays a primary role. I am a big fan of using various forms of case studies within accredited education because of their storytelling capabilities and applicability to the real world. Really, the typical patient-provider encounter is just a story broken down into various elements.

I’ll illustrate how in a moment, but first, a quick story (of course)…

Last night, I was somewhat ironically helping my 14-year-old son prepare for an English quiz that focused on the five plot elements of Freytag’s pyramid. If you aren’t familiar with Freytag’s pyramid (and if you are, you must be a big English nerd), it essentially breaks down any story into five crucial elements. Allow me to align these with your typical patient-provider visit:

Element 1: The Exposition. This is basically the background of the story – who are the main characters, how do they relate to each other, where are things taking place, etc. Within a medical case study perspective, this introduces the patient and gives us some background into their family and medical history, their current medications, and so on — basically, everything within their initial chart presentation.

Element 2: Rising Action. This is the part of the story where the action starts to heat up. Often, it’s where our “hero” meets the “villain,” or in literary terms, where the protagonist meets the antagonist. While you may commonly picture the antagonist as a person or being (ie, The Joker or your mother-in-law), this isn’t always the case. In a medical case study, the antagonist is typically health, pain, or something like that. As the rising action phase emerges in our case studies, we find out what’s wrong with the patient (why are they here?) and perhaps get details from a physical exam, lab results, imaging, etc.

Element 3: Climax. This is the turning point of the story, where the protagonist and antagonist collide in a series of events that lead to either their success or downfall. In a medical case study, this is where the (hopefully) shared decision is made regarding what should be done to help cure the patient, alleviate their pain, and get them back to a healthier state.

Element 4: Falling Action. This is where the climax comes to an end and prepares us for the conclusion. It’s where the antagonist lays in a heap with their last breaths after being vanquished by our swashbuckling hero. Or, in our medical case study, the patient and clinician cement their agreement on the best plan of action and go their separate ways.

Element 5: Resolution/denouement. This is where we typically get our happy ending (or not). So for our medical case studies, the resolution is when the patient always, absolutely, positively gets better. Or maybe they don’t. Depending on the complexity of our case, the story arc may now bring us back to element 2 where the patient returns with a new complaint/issue that needs addressing. Life isn’t a fairy tale, after all.

I was going to write more today about a related theme from last week’s conference (celebrating our failures), but since this blog is already plenty long enough and you surely have work to do today, I’ll leave you in suspense for another day soon.

So for now, may you enjoy many happily ever afters…

 

REMINDER: Final Day for Grant Anatomy 101 Survey

It’s been a busy week in CMEpaloozaville, so just a quick post today to remind everyone that today is the last day to take the Grant Anatomy 101 survey. We have had a nice response to the survey thus far — so much so that we filled up all the response slots allotted with the free SurveyMonkey account. Oops. No worries, I created a new form in Google so we can accept all of the hundreds of responses that will surely come in today.

CLICK HERE TO TAKE THE GRANT ANATOMY 101 SURVEY

Additionally, both Scott and I wanted to give a big thank you to everyone who came out for our second CMEpalooza Trivia Night during the Alliance Industry Summit on Tuesday. We had a ton of fun doing it and couldn’t have asked for a better crowd. Shout out to AcademicCME for sponsoring the event (and Tim Hayes for being a good sport) and the Alliance for giving us the opportunity. Congratulations to the winners of cash prizes for being smart and speedy (our winners have asked to remain anonymous so no one hits them up for loans).

Let’s do it again next year!

Take the Grant Anatomy 101 Survey! (Please?)

I’m sorry I don’t have any fascinating or hilarious personal anecdotes to kick off today’s blog post, unless you want to hear about the dang cat stealing my chair every time I leave the office for a couple minutes. Somehow, even if I only leave the room for 30 seconds, he still has enough time to jump up on the chair, curl up, and fall sound asleep before I get back. He’s so annoying.

 

 

 

 

 

 

I suppose it’s better than him plotting how he’s going to murder me in my sleep, which is what I assume he is doing whenever he’s awake.

Besides that important news, the primary goal of today’s post is to ask everyone who writes, edits, prepares, reads, reviews, analyzes, or has even a remote interest in grant proposals to please take a couple minutes to complete our Grant Anatomy 101 survey. Mike LoPresti, moderator for our 10 a.m. Grant Anatomy 101: Dissecting A Grant Proposal session, put together this survey in order to gather YOUR questions about grant proposals for our supporter panel to gain their feedback, insights, preferences, and dislikes.

Please provide any questions you may have around the typical sections of a proposal, which you will find grouped into key categories in the survey. Feel free to respond to as many or few sections as you like. Answers are anonymous and open-ended, so you are encouraged to speak your mind and not be afraid to share openly.

We will keep the survey open for 1 week, so you have until the end of the day on September 12 to respond. Thanks in advance to all who respond!

CLICK HERE FOR THE GRANT ANATOMY 101 SURVEY!